Vault Boundaries & Disclosures
This page is the public-facing statement of what WalletWall’s vault surfaces are and are not.| Surface | Route | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Stablecoin Vault | vault.walletwall.org / /stablecoin-vault | Flagship vault readiness journey — four-outcome readiness assessment, no custody |
| Vault Simulator | /vault | Sepolia testnet rehearsal detail — hybrid PQ authorization simulation, surfaced from the Testnet Rehearsal outcome |
No custody
WalletWall does not take custody of user funds — at any time, in any form.- No key storage. WalletWall never stores, receives, transmits, or logs private keys, seed phrases, or mnemonic words. There is no input field, API endpoint, or database that accepts key material.
- No signing authority. WalletWall constructs unsigned, human-readable EIP-712 typed messages for user review. The user’s own wallet provider signs. WalletWall holds no signing key.
- No discretionary control. WalletWall never has authority to move, freeze, or recover funds without an explicit, per-action signature from the user.
- No seed phrase requests. WalletWall will never ask for a seed phrase or mnemonic. Any surface requesting mnemonic material is not WalletWall.
The readiness scanner is fully read-only — no wallet connection, signature, or transaction is required to scan an address.
No income-generating product or advice
WalletWall is wallet intelligence, not a financial product or financial adviser.- No income-generating product. No WalletWall surface produces, promises, or simulates income on assets.
- No promised returns. No annualized rate, income projection, or cash-out countdown.
- No monetary campaign points. Proof-of-Readiness campaign points are readiness attestations only. They carry no monetary value and no redemption right.
- No financial advice. All signals, scores, and recommendations are research intelligence and migration-readiness indicators — not investment, tax, legal, or financial advice. Consult a qualified professional for those needs.
- No insurance. WalletWall makes no insurance claim. No FDIC, SIPC, or any deposit-insurance analogue applies.
Testnet and mock assets only
The vault simulator operates on testnet infrastructure with assets that have no monetary value.| Property | Current state |
|---|---|
| Network | Local Hardhat (chain ID 31337) or Ethereum Sepolia (chain ID 11155111) — rehearsal/dev simulator only |
| Deposited asset | MockUSDC (mUSDC) — a mock USDC-style ERC-20 test token, not real USDC, freely mintable, no monetary value |
| Mainnet deposits | Not supported — blocked at the app and contract level |
| Real stablecoins | Not accepted — real USDC, USDT, DAI, or any other mainnet asset is never deposited |
| Audit status | Not audited — this is a research prototype |
Quantum-resistance boundaries
The vault prototype demonstrates a hybrid classical + post-quantum authorization model. This is not a guarantee of quantum-proof protection.- No “quantum-proof” claim. WalletWall does not assert that any wallet, vault, or asset is quantum-proof, quantum-safe today, or protected from quantum attacks.
- Trusted attestation, not trustless on-chain PQ. Post-quantum authorization in the prototype uses a trusted attestation path: an authorized attestor verifies ML-DSA-65 off-chain, then publishes a signed EIP-712 attestation on-chain. ML-DSA is not verified on-chain in the current prototype.
- Mock verifier is structural only.
MockMLDSAVerifieris a mock verifier used for simulator structure and testing. It does not perform real on-chain ML-DSA cryptographic verification. - Experimental verifier hooks. The
IPQCVerifierinterface and its implementations are research primitives, not production-grade security. - Quantum Intelligence scores are exposure indicators. The Quantum Exposure Score reflects how much signature-exposure risk a wallet has accumulated — it is not a safety certification.
- Migration Readiness is advisory. The readiness engine produces a guidance
outcome (
Monitor / Prepare / Testnet Rehearsal / Not Enough Data). It is informational, not a security guarantee.
Production and mainnet custody
No production custody path exists. The following gates would all need to be cleared before any mainnet custody consideration:G1 — Independent security audit
A completed, published audit of vault contracts and the attestation service by an independent third party. Not started.
G2 — On-chain PQ verification
ML-DSA (FIPS 204) or equivalent verified on-chain, not via a trusted attestor. Research prototype only.
G3 — Legal review
Legal analysis of money-transmission and securities law for target jurisdictions, with appropriate licensing or exemptions. Not started.
G4 — Operational controls
Production key management, incident response, SLA, and continuity documentation. Not started.
G5 — Regulatory clearance
Any required regulatory approval or sandbox participation. Not started.
G6 — Separate mainnet spec
A completely separate product spec, threat model, and audit for any mainnet path. Not started.
Repo boundary
The app and the vault contract live in separate repositories with separate responsibilities.| Responsibility | App (sirmrdrgod/walletwall) | Vault repo (Wallet-Wall/walletwall-vault) |
|---|---|---|
| Product UI and intelligence surfaces | ✓ | — |
| Vault readiness workflow and simulator entry | ✓ | — |
| Pinned ABI / EIP-712 schema / deployment config | ✓ (reference only) | ✓ (owned) |
| Smart contracts and mock ERC-20 token | — | ✓ |
| PQ verifier interfaces and implementations | — | ✓ |
| Attestation service | — | ✓ |
| Testnet deployment scripts | — | ✓ |
| Security model and threat model | — | ✓ |
Related
WalletWall Vault feature
Implementation details, authorization flow, deployment status, and approved framing.
Key Management & Recovery Model
Non-custodial hard rules and recovery-path design constraints.

